BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] |
|
England and Wales High Court (King's Bench Division) Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (King's Bench Division) Decisions >> Baker v Bolton & Ors [1808] EWHC KB J92 (8 December 1808) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/1808/J92.html Cite as: 170 ER 1033, [1808] EWHC KB J92, (1808) 1 Camp 493 |
||
[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
(1808) 1 Camp 493; 170 ER 1033 |
||
B e f o r e :
____________________
| BAKER | ||
| v | ||
| BOLTON AND OTHERS |
____________________
This was an action against the defendants as proprietors of a stage-coach, on the top of which the plaintiff and his late wife were travelling from Portsmouth to London, when it was overturned; whereby the plaintiff himself was much bruised, and his wife was so severely hurt, that she died about a month after in an hospital. The declaration besides other special damage, stated, that "by means of the premises, the plaintiff had wholly lost, and been deprived of the comfort, fellowship, and assistance of his said wife, and had from thence hitherto suffered and undergone great grief, vexation, and anguish of mind."
It appeared that the plaintiff was much attached to his deceased wife; and that, being a publican, she had been of great use to him in conducting his business.
But Lord Ellenborough said, the jury could only take into consideration the bruises which the plaintiff had himself sustained, and the loss of his wife's society, and the distress of mind he had suffered on her account, from the time of the accident till the moment of her dissolution. In a civil Court, the death of a human being could not be complained of as an injury; and in this case the damages, as to the plaintiff's wife, must stop with the period of her existence.
Verdict for the plaintiff, with £100 damages.[1]
Park and Marryat for the plaintiff.
The Attorney-General for the defendant.
Note 1 If the wife be killed on the spot, is this to be considereddamnum absque injuria? N1. P. I. -33 [Back]
